Hi, I would like to know if it would be possibel to install Xivo onto a NAS system, like Synology or Qnap. I am selling synology systems to small businesses and end-users as integrated devices for multiple functions. Together with home automation systems, these make a it nice package. One of the items lacking, is however a good integrated VOIP system. Synology has an asterisk package, but this is a really outdated version (lots of security issues), so this is not usable. As these synology systems are based upon Debian Linux, it should't be so hard to get a version of XIVO running on it I guess.
As the synology's already have very large market share, I think it would be a really good opportunity for XIVO, to spread your name, with an alternative package for the integrated VOIP server app. FYI it is possible to install ipkg packages on the synology's, greets Replies (7). I have NOT tried this but I can speculate: I know there is a package to install a Debian chroot environment (third party, if there is interest I can lookup which repo has it.) I suppose it should be possible to install WAZO/XIVO in this chroot'd environment as technically this should appear as a full Debian install to the WAZO software. I wouldn't expect to be able to install WAZO natively into the Syn OS (called DSM) because of the limited busybox environment/shell but the chroot'd Debian instance should give a fully capable Deb install afaik. Of course you'd probably want one of the more 'capable' Syn NASes for this (ie. Not a 'j' model) and you probably need something a bit newer that's Atom/x86 based because I don't think there's XIVO/WAZO packages for ARM. (correct me if I'm wrong please) Anyway, I'd be interested if someone tries this out.
Right now I'm too new with WAZO to add the extra complexity of an unknown environment but maybe someday I'll get there and try. Till then good luck to anyone who tries and please report back your results. EDIT- Debian chroot package comes from SynoCommunity (add in package center) hth.
Installing 3rd party software on your Synology DiskStation DS411j Jan 9, 2012. Note: I recently purchased a & I’m putting up posts about things I figure out. This is part of that series. The Synology DiskStation comes with a pretty darn complete collection of services & software that you can access & use through the DSM, the DiskStation Manager GUI. As I’ve been mentioning, though, you can also SSH into the DiskStation CLI (Command Line Interface) & run commands there. The DiskStation comes with a large assortment of commands already present, but you can install others as well, which is what I’ll focus on here.
You could download source code & compile it, of course, but I’m not going to cover that here (maybe in a later post). When I can, I like to take the easy route & install pre-compiled software packages. Fortunately, you can find, install, & manage a very large collection of pre-compiled software packages for your Synology DiskStation using a very cool command line tool called.
If you’re familiar with on Debian, you’ll find ipkg to be instantly understandable. For those of you not in the know, ipkg is a package manager: it’s software that connects to a repository, a large collection of software packages, & then makes it easy for you to download, install, update, & remote packages on your Linux box.
So let’s install ipkg so we can then install other software on the Synology DiskStation! Now find out which ipkg bootstrap you should get at this page, located on the Synology wiki:. In my case, the Marvell Kirkwood mv6281 wants this one:. Log in to the DiskStation as root. Cd to the temp directory on volume1: cd /volume1/@tmp Use wget to download the bootstrap: wget Make the downloaded bootstrap executable: chmod 755 syno-mvkw-bootstrap1.2-7arm.xsh Run the bootstrap:./syno-mvkw-bootstrap1.2-7arm.xsh Delete the bootstrap, as it’s no longer needed: rm syno-mvkw-bootstrap1.2-7arm.xsh Reboot the DiskStation using the GUI or the CLI. With the GUI, click on the Main Menu (Synology’s term, not mine) & choose Restart.
If you’re logged in to the CLI, enter: restart When the DiskStation comes back up, log in as root & update the ipkg repository: ipkg update This will give you results like this: Downloading Inflating Updated list of available packages in /opt/lib/ipkg/lists/cross Successfully terminated. Mac users, think of it as the App Store, but typically for everything on your computer, not just the stuff that Apple has approved.
Windows users, think of it as the promised App Store that Microsoft says it’s going to include in Windows 8. I’m giving you the page name because it looks to me like a really crappy page name that somebody typed out on a wiki after about four seconds of thought, meaning that someone else who has more of a clue is going to come along & change the name to something better later. If the link is ever broken, head over to the & search for “install ipkg”. That should find it. vi comes on the Synology DiskStation by default (it comes on every UNIX by default!), but I vastly prefer vim, as do all right-thinking people everywhere.
Just typing vim works, as /opt/bin is in your path. You can see yours easily; type this.
Install Asterisk On Synology Dsm To Pc
Hi, the objective isn't to run 3CX in emulation mode, we know that it's ok. The objective is to have a simple package to launch 3CX in full DSM or QTS environment, more simple to deploy, administer and support, more layers, more troubles. Second point is that not all NAS can run virtualization, but approximately all NAS can run 3CX for TPE / PME / Home because pre-requises are very light. Jerem1 say it's ok on.NET, have you heard about a 3CX project on Windows 10 for IOT?
I mean, 3CX is a light soft that can run over very small computers, so Raspberry et entry level NAS are small computers, not very expensive and made to run 7/7, with native RAID1 for NAS, that's not the case for Shutle for example. You would not want to have 3CX running in the native environment of a NAS, you would want it virtualized.
These distros are linux, but very stripped down, and often chop shopped for space savings, and packed full of other services running in the background, using up ports, etc. A virtualized environment, on a NAS that supports virtualization, such as a QNAP X86-64 variant would produce the best results, with the least additional complexity of having to make 3cx work with all the other software on the nas without conflicting in unexpected ways. There are other options as well, such as the Embedded Network Infrastructure boxes, i have debian running on a number of them just fine, and they are available with mSATA SSDs, up to Intel I5 CPUs, and up to 16-32 GB of RAM. All in a box that you can hold in one hand.
![]()
Roughly 1.5in x 5in x 3.5in size. Just because theoretically you could finagle 3CX to run on a NAS among all the other internal processes, does not stand to reason that you should. IT inherently invites more places for potential problems with conflicts and compatibility to happen. ALSO, if you were to set one up in the NAS virtualization, you would need to make sure the NAS has a stronger CPU, such as an Intel I3, I5, Xeon, etc.
The Celeron NAS's have some noticable lag in virtualization, even the quad core celeron versions. Ive tested this with a QNAP TS-451 with 8GB RAM, a VM with 2 cores and 4GB was still noticably stuttering when hosting a network service. Fine for most things, but just stuttery enough, it makes me worry it would be very bad for Audio Streams.
Something like our QNAP TVS-871 would be overkill im sure, as its lowest model has an I3, and highest an I7, but i cant test with that one because its in our production environment doing iSCSI. Click to expand.OK, so my credentials include CCNA(Expired), CISSO, CVA, Computer Forensics, Network+, Security+, Linux+, etc.
Ive also been developing on Linux and BSD for about 15 years now, so thats my background. And from that background, not trying to brag here, and with the knowledge i have garnered working with, building out, and troubleshooting 3CX for 3 years straight now, there are significant complexities involved in what your asking for. More so then you probably expect. The OSI model asside and having little to do with the problem, 'network wise', 3CX should function perfectly running from a QNAP, virtualized or not. The issue would most likely be in the software stack itself. QNAP is proprietary, non open source, with lots of open source mixed in.
Download adobe premiere pro cs6 32 bit portable ice. Dec 24, 2017 - Adobe premiere pro cs6 32 bit free download with crack kickass company of heroes 2 keygen download. Autocad 2013 64 bit windows 8 ice.
3CX Support and Engineering themselves insists that a server used for 3CX not be used for anything else, and this is because 3CX has a lot of moving parts, and it can become very hard to diagnose and troubleshoot issues, when there are a lot more systems running in the background, and using various sockets all over the place. 3CX uses a number of socket connections on localhost for its various services to talk to each other, and these also, would have issues if any of those sockets were conflicted as well. But even if there were no socket/network conflicts period, all the other software on the qnap could 'potentially' cause a troubleshooting nightmare if not at least unpredictable function.
Is saving a couple hundred bucks, worth hours of troubleshooting down the road? If it is by all means continue down this path, more power too you. But having worked these kind of situations before coming into situations where internal teams did something that was a bad idea to save money or time, i can attest, it is better to do it the simpler, supported, right way the first time. Now if your also wanting it to run on the ARM based QNAP and Synology devices, might as well throw even more complexity in because that would most likely require them to completely re-compile 3CX as those CPUs do not run the same architecture, and there are yet more differences in the stack they would have to run, not to mention the processing power deficit those ARM based NAS Devices also suffer from. Perhaps someone from 3CX Staff would like to chime in? You're right, we're not here for a certification competition, but obviously it still feels good to show them off.
However, you keep forgetting that we are talking about very small businesses that only need one or two lines, and the aim is to provide an alternative to the offers of ISPs that offer a voice line with the Internet line without any service. For these clients, a $500 NAS is already a significant investment. Once again, you have the right to disagree, but this is not the debate, you just have to forget this post and wait to get back our customers that we will not be able to troubleshoot.
This entry was posted in and tagged on by 1. Installation Simply find and install a Docker application from the Synology Package Center.
It's an interesting idea but I'd not do that unless you are just doing that for home. You want a fully supported PBX platform for business use, not just Asterisk 'available' on Synology.
Synology, to the best of my knowledge, does not provide any support for Asterisk on there so any Asterisk or Synology update might cause problems and patches and updates might not be forthcoming. Beyond that, PBXs are typically high priority and not appropriate for an SMB class NAS device. Synology is nice but this isn't a good use for it, in my opinion. Do you not have a server to put a PBX on? What is driving you to want to consider this route?
By using your own PBX on your own hardware you can control what updates are installed to the root OS and not be worried that all of a sudden a Synology update may bomb your Asterisk server. Then what do you do? What what if a firmware rollback makes Asterisk work but bombs your file shares?
By keeping the two separate, you do better in terms of DR and overall control. More than anything that sounds like something Synology added as a pure marketing tactic to get people to use their device as an all-in-one solution. Scott Alan Miller wrote: It's an interesting idea but I'd not do that unless you are just doing that for home. You want a fully supported PBX platform for business use, not just Asterisk 'available' on Synology. Synology, to the best of my knowledge, does not provide any support for Asterisk on there so any Asterisk or Synology update might cause problems and patches and updates might not be forthcoming. Beyond that, PBXs are typically high priority and not appropriate for an SMB class NAS device. Synology is nice but this isn't a good use for it, in my opinion.
Do you not have a server to put a PBX on? What is driving you to want to consider this route? I'm looking at upgrading our Shoretel system which I'm expecting to be fairly expensive. I plan to compare the cost of other systems besides just paying for the upgrade. Synology has the ability to mirror two devices and if I was going to do this they would also be dedicated. My thought was that this is basically Asterisk on Linux.
But it doesn't sound like anyone has gone this route so I'm not going to spend any more time on it. @Nate What was the result of your PBX research? I'd be curious to see if you found something cost effective to replace ShoreTel. I've worked on dozens of ShoreTel systems and have been surprised at how resilient it is. With some exception where the handsets or the voice switch are dropped from support, the system can be upgraded forever. Usually the only thing you need to do is update your server every 5 or 6 years and pay for support to be on the latest version. I'm not paid by ShoreTel, so I don't want to sound like too much of a fanboy.
Install Asterisk On Synology Dsm In Vm
I've thought that small offices might be just as well suited by a freepbx type of system as well. Steve-DC wrote: @Nate What was the result of your PBX research? I'd be curious to see if you found something cost effective to replace ShoreTel. I've worked on dozens of ShoreTel systems and have been surprised at how resilient it is. With some exception where the handsets or the voice switch are dropped from support, the system can be upgraded forever. Usually the only thing you need to do is update your server every 5 or 6 years and pay for support to be on the latest version.
I'm not paid by ShoreTel, so I don't want to sound like too much of a fanboy. I've thought that small offices might be just as well suited by a freepbx type of system as well. So far I don't know. I'm meeting with our Shoretel vendor in a few weeks. It has been several months since your last post. How did your meeting go with Shoretel.
We are on 12.3 and we are not currently on maintenance and have been off for the last two years. We are looking at restoring because we would like to go to 13.3. I heard 14.2 is a nightmare. I have played with Asterisk in the past and it is extremely hard to program up from scratch. But this might just be the avenue to try next. I have an extra Synology from a closed down office I can play with. I have found that Yealink phones work best with the Shoretel.
If any one is interested I did a phone test with several SIP phones and Yealink won out. I wish I seen this forum a long time ago, I am a VOIP guy now after 15 years of installing old school Telecom PBX technology I now support VOIP 100%. For Shoretel and others like then I think it is so funny that people keep falling for someone relabeling asterisk and charging for it LOL! I can support hundreds of extensions on asterisk the only thing you need to do correctly is a real Firewall, QOS is a must, VLANs are a must, a real router, a real switch, a real server (to many people cheap out by no buying Cisco router and switches) Rules- QOS and VLAN! RULES- Buy real equipment! Not off the shelf Rules- Please do not use default passwords Rules- VOIP/SIP will be hacked its a fact so be ready for it.
Hi, I'm trying to setup a cheap VoIP system for my wifes new business, currently she needs just a single endpoint, but will need two by years end. We have a synology box at the house (where she works from) so want to use that, so thought about the Asterisk bundle.
Install Asterisk On Synology Dsm Esxi
If anyone has any step by step guides that'd be awesome. I had it accepting calls today (no extensions) so just got the 'Congratulations, you've successfully setup.' Message but 2 hrs later all I'm getting is failed calls when I call in:( So any and all help would be awesome thank you. I'm not an IT guy by any stretch, but I have been messing with stuff for years, so do have a basic understanding.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |